By far the most-asked beauty question in my texts and Instagram DMs is: what’s a good moisturizer ? Of course, I always recommend a few,...

By far the most-asked beauty question in my texts and Instagram DMs is: what’s a good moisturizer? Of course, I always recommend a few, but it seems my friends, family, and colleagues are after something pretty elusive. They want it to be substantially moisturizing but not thick or suffocating. They want it to leave their skin feeling smooth and to sit well under makeup without breaking them out. And, as creatures of habit, they want something that transcends all seasons — from winter all the way through summer.  

Usually, I’d say a moisturizer like that doesn’t exist. But I’ll happily eat my words, because I think I’ve found it in e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Goals. Did I mention it’s only $13? 

What is e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Goals and what are the benefits? 

Assuming it hasn’t already flooded your TikTok feed, Barrier Goals Cream is a day and nighttime moisturizer with one main focus: healing and protecting the skin barrier — the outermost layer of skin that keeps the good stuff, like moisture, in and the not-so-good stuff, like bacteria, out. When the skin barrier is compromised, you might notice dryness, sensitivity, and stinging. 

You’d be forgiven for thinking the only thing that can disrupt your skin barrier is cold weather. While that’s certainly a factor, even something as simple as using the wrong cleanser (typically one that’s harsh and stripping), washing your face in hot water, or overdoing exfoliating acids and retinoids can weaken the barrier. Not too long ago, I made the easy mistake of washing my face in a hot shower, and my skin immediately felt the effects. It became tight and flaky, and my usual moisturizer just wasn’t cutting it, so I picked up Barrier Goals — and I’m so glad I did. 

Unlike many barrier moisturizers, which are often packed with ingredients like petrolatum and can feel heavy on the skin, this one absorbed in seconds, instantly relieving tightness without leaving behind an oily or sticky residue. The star ingredient is 1% colloidal oatmeal (also known as oat kernel flour). It may sound basic, but it shouldn’t be underestimated. This unassuming ingredient is proven to soothe dry, reactive skin — which is why you’ll find it in many eczema products — all without clogging pores. 

Then there’s cica, also known as centella asiatica. Frequently used in rosacea-focused formulas, this plant-based ingredient helps reduce visible redness, leaving skin looking more even-toned. Alongside these, you’ll find hydrating hyaluronic acid and ultra-moisturizing glycerin — two non-negotiables in any moisturizer I use. 

e.l.f. Holy Hydration! Barrier Goals Cream, $13 

What makes e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Cream special? 

Beyond the ingredients, the texture is what makes e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration Barrier Cream stand out. It sits somewhere between a gel and a cream, making it feel featherlight on the skin, yet you can trust that the smart formula is working hard to deliver moisture exactly where it’s needed most. 

In fact, I know it is. Just a couple of days after switching to this cream, the flaky patches on my cheeks, nose, and forehead had disappeared completely. And although the texture dries down to a matte finish, my skin quickly regained its glow — so much so that I’m now using barely any foundation — just a dab of concealer here and there — thanks to my more even tone and smoother texture. 

It’s rare to find a moisturizer formulated with such a wide range of skin types in mind — specifically dry, sensitive, and combination skin, according to e.l.f. — but this one works across the board. I had a few extras that I lent to two friends, one with acne-prone skin and another with very dry, eczema-prone skin, and both have since messaged me singing its praises. As someone with combination skin that both breaks out and gets dry in places, I can confirm it keeps everything balanced and happy.  

It’s perfect for in-between weather as we move from winter into spring, but it’s also excellent in humidity. We had a particularly warm, humid day in London recently, and while my makeup and skincare usually melt off when I’m outside, my skin felt completely intact. I think that has something to do with the dimethicone, a clever, skin-friendly silicone that helps skin look and feel smooth for longer. 

What to know about e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Cream 

• Lightweight yet substantially moisturizing lotion, packed with soothing colloidal oatmeal and redness-reducing cica. 

• Can be used in the morning, layered under sunscreen and makeup, and as part of your evening routine. 

• Non-comedogenic (unlikely to clog pores or cause breakouts) and suitable for sensitive and eczema-prone skin. 

How do you use e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Cream? 

I’ve found Barrier Goals to be the perfect companion to Differin and other high-strength retinoids. My skin can become flaky and sore while using them, but applying a layer of the Barrier Cream first completely eliminates the issue.

If I go overboard on Barrier Goals, I even massage the excess onto my chronically parched lips and the backs of my hands — and I’m always pleasantly surprised by how soft and renewed they look and feel. Better still, I love that it comes in a tube rather than a deep pot, which makes it easier — and more hygienic — to apply with long nails like mine.  

At $13, it’s a no-brainer for anyone searching for a comfortable moisturizer that truly does it all. 

Where can you get e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Cream? 

e.l.f.’s Holy Hydration! Barrier Goals Cream is $13 and available at ulta.comelfcosmetics.com, and Amazon

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Tatcha's New Moisturizer Surprised Me — Here's Why

The Ordinary’s New Moisturizer Fixed My Dry Skin

Editor-Approved Moisturizers For Dry, Thirsty Skin



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/uhkSYmB
via IFTTT

Welcome to Money Diaries where we are tackling the ever-present taboo that is money. We’re asking real people how they spend their hard-ea...

Welcome to Money Diaries where we are tackling the ever-present taboo that is money. We’re asking real people how they spend their hard-earned money during a seven-day period — and we’re tracking every last dollar.

This week: A data engineer working in engineering who makes $185,000 per year and spends some of it on four Ed Sheeran concert tickets.

This Money Diary was written in the summer of 2025.

If you’d like to submit your own Money Diary, you can do so via our online form. We pay $150 for each published diary. Apologies but we’re not able to reply to every email. Please note: We are legally unable to publish any diaries that have been written with the use of AI.

Editor’s note: After a short hiatus, we’re back once a week! Thank you for your patience. We’ll be honoring Money Diary submissions we received during our break by publishing them in the coming weeks. There’s more to come soon — stay tuned.

Occupation: Data Engineer
Industry: Technology/engineering
Age: 27
Location: Greater Boston Area
Salary: $185,000
Joint Income/Financial Setup: Our joint income is $360,000. We share a SoFi savings account and use it to pay our joint expenses.

Personal Assets
Chase Checking: $5,289.44
Ally Savings: $5,101.90
Ally Investments: $59,213.36
Fidelity retirement accounts: $128,204.57 (I have just about every single type of retirement account you can possibly have because I was self-employed while working a full-time job for the first year after college).
401k: $52.084.27 (from my current job that I’m soon leaving).
HSA:$7,896.48

Joint Assets
SoFi Savings: $34,611.71
Condo: $532,438 (according to Redfin).
Car: $10,000
Debt: $335,324.33 (mortgage).
Paycheck Amount (2x month): $4471.5 (after taxes, health insurance, and contributions to retirement accounts).
Pronouns: She/her

Monthly Expenses
Housing Costs: $2406.09 (for a condo my fiancé and I own).
Loan Payments: $0
Netflix: $7.99
Classpass: $55
Pet insurance: $18
Utilities: $70-450 (winter is brutal for the cost of utilities in Boston).
Internet: $45
Phone: $0 (I’m on a family plan).
Savings: I automate $1000 per month from my checking account to my savings account, but I had to pause this to pay down all the wedding vendor deposits, which halved my savings account.

Yearly Expenses
Botanical Garden Patron Membership: $300
Exponent Membership: $100
Chase Sapphire Preferred Fee: $95

Was there an expectation for you to attend higher education? Did you participate in any form of higher education? If yes, how did you pay for it?
Yes, my dad is a professor/researcher who has a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and my mom got her Bachelor’s degree in Math. They were both first-gen college students. I got my B.S. in Math and Physics and my M.S. in Data Analytics. I had a full-ride scholarship in undergrad in addition to attending a college where my dad taught, and that gave me free tuition. The leftover money from the scholarship just went straight to me, and I used most of it for my half of the down payment for my mortgage.

Growing up, what kind of conversations did you have about money? Did your parent(s) educate you about finances?
We didn’t have conversations; it was mostly my mom yelling at us saying I couldn’t go to my friends’ birthday parties because she couldn’t afford a gift. While my dad was doing his PhD, money was extremely tight since he was making $28K. A lot of the time we would just eat instant ramen for dinner and McDonald’s for road trips (back when McDonald’s was actually cheap). I don’t think my parents were the worst with money, but you can’t budget your way out of poverty. My younger sister is 10 years younger than me and grew up in a far more lavish lifestyle than I did because my dad then got a six-figure job and my family bought a house. I had to educate myself on things like 401ks and stocks using the internet. I watched YouTube videos from Graham Stephan (whom I find a little problematic now), but it was still helpful to start, even if his advice isn’t perfect. I think that’s the biggest lesson I learned from my financial journey that kind of applies to everything: it’s important to just start.

What was your first job and why did you get it?
My first job was the summer right before college working as an international cultural adjustment coordinator for the university I attended to help international graduate students adapt to life in the U.S. The hiring manager said I got the job because I was trilingual (English, Mandarin, and Spanish). This meant mostly translating and filling out paperwork, but I also led several workshops on etiquette and slang, which was kind of fun, and I learned a lot about Indian culture since many of the grad students were Indian. It’s a job I’ve been doing for my parents for my whole life so it was pretty easy. I applied for the job for extra spending money and because I get bored easily and wanted to leave the house.

Did you worry about money growing up?
Yes, it was a constant worry since my mom never had a full-time job growing up. At times, I resented her for it because all of my other friends were in dual-income families (and upper-middle class) and for most of my childhood, we were under the poverty line because my dad was a PhD student (that income is not meant to support a family). I thought with her Bachelor’s degree in Math, she could get a job as a math teacher but she was never able to pass the exams. Now I understand it’s very difficult to get a job, especially if English isn’t your first language, and she wanted to devote her full attention to her three kids.

Do you worry about money now?
A little, but logically speaking, I know I shouldn’t be. A couple of months ago I was so frustrated with my past job that I was about to just quit and look for a job full-time, but then I got an offer and started a new job. So I guess I feel comfortable quitting my job without one lined up nowadays.

At what age did you become financially responsible for yourself and do you have a financial safety net?
I was financially responsible for myself since I was 18 because I had income from scholarships, internships, and the tuition waiver. I have money in two savings accounts and my fiancé is another source of income I can rely on if I really hate my job and want to quit.

Do you or have you ever received passive or inherited income? If yes, please explain.
Other than the little dividends I get in stock, no. My fiancé’s dad will give us $30,000 for the wedding next year if that counts.

Day One: Monday

9 a.m. — I log into work (I have a remote job) and find out there are four new bugs. My manager told us to be less perfectionist about our code and now she’s surprised that when we lower our standards, it creates issues somehow — but I manage to fix two of them and the other two I assign to someone else.

12 p.m. — I buy some more Band-Aids for a first-aid kit because my cat scratched my fiancé, L. and I. Not sure what happened when we were gone on a weekend trip, but normally she’s very sweet and doesn’t scratch anyone. $29.00

5 p.m. — I buy a wedding seating chart sign on Etsy after they gave me a 10% off coupon and I got paid $2.07 from Google surveys. $14.00

Daily Total: $43.00

Day Two: Tuesday

9 a.m. — I log into work again. I eat the leftover Greek food (pork, cucumber, and tomato rice pilaf) that L. brought back from work while checking my emails.

9:30 a.m. — I buy Ed Sheeran tickets at Gillette Stadium for next year! I end up waiting in line for 30 minutes in the presale but it was totally worth it. L. and I are going to the concert with his mom and dad, who are Ed Sheeran fans that have gone to every concert he’s had in the Boston area! Parking will be a challenge so L. and I might end up taking the T to Back Bay and then the commuter rail to avoid the traffic after the concert. $600.00

5 p.m. — L. and I head out to celebrate our 8th anniversary at an Italian place. I order the bolognese and L. orders the spicy rigatoni, which has a really interesting flavor. We get a chocolate lava cake and tiramisu for dessert since it’s our anniversary. I’m so grateful he’s in my life; he helped me find a new job by doing all the chores while I was preparing for coding interviews and he also supported me through my health issues and drove me to all my endocrinology appointments. I was diagnosed three months ago with Graves’ disease, which causes hyperthyroidism. He’s also very hot! I always thought that couples eventually lose their attraction to each other, but luckily for us, that’s not the case. I always felt that it was okay if I didn’t have the best job or parents as long as I have the best partner. Most of the good things in my life have been because of him, directly or indirectly, and we see eye to eye on all the important things. $90.00

Daily Total: $690.00

Day Three: Wednesday

9 a.m. — Same as the previous days! I eat some of the leftover Italian food from yesterday. The bolognese was almost as good reheated and I had some spicy broccolini, too. I don’t really eat traditional breakfasts and lunches, so I’ll usually eat a brunch whenever I have time during work.

5:30 p.m. — I order a pad see ew, drunken noodles, and Panang curry for L., his work friend E., and me on Uber Eats from a local Thai place. I walk to it in like three minutes to pick it all up. $48.06

7 p.m. — I buy a day pass at a climbing gym to go climbing with L. and E. I’m still very sore from a hike from last weekend, so I don’t climb too much, but it was fun to catch up with E. since him and L. recently went to Chicago for an electronic dance music concert. $30.00

Daily Total: $78.06

Day Four: Thursday

9 a.m. — I log into work and eat some leftover Thai food. I swear we don’t normally get takeout/eat out every day, but it’s our anniversary this week. Also, with my illness, it’s really hard for me to work up the motivation to cook a meal from scratch after a full day of working.

12 p.m. — Today is my little brother’s birthday. I give him an Uber Eats gift card to buy whatever he wants to eat for his birthday. Last year, I bought him Airpod Pros, so this year I’m spending a little less since he really doesn’t need anything and I also need to buy him a graduation gift and pay for part of my wedding. He’s starting his last year of college and already got a full-time return offer! His manager gave him a senior software engineer position because he was so impressed but also told him to keep interviewing for better offers. I didn’t even know that was possible and wish I had a supportive manager like that. $100.00

5 p.m. — I FaceTime with my brother, P. and talk about my new job and my illness. He asks me a lot of questions about my illness, which I know he does out of concern, but I’m honestly tired of talking about it since it’s always on my mind nowadays, so I change the conversation to his PhD applications. I’m hoping he will do his PhD at a school in the Boston area, but it sounds like he would rather be in the Bay Area closer to family. We’ll see what happens next year.

Daily Total: $100.00

Day Five: Friday

9 a.m. — I head to Dunkin’ to work and get a matcha latte and a BLT. The matcha is a little too sweet for my taste. I have some Amex Gold card credit (which I canceled this year but still have some remaining funds in the Dunkin’ app) so I figure I should use it before I forget it’s there. Because this is the Boston area, there’s a Dunkin’ just three minutes away from me. Once, when I was at Logan Airport, there was this guy who almost missed his flight and had to be called three times because he was getting Dunkin’ coffee for his whole family. The weirdest thing is that JetBlue serves free Dunkin’ coffee anyways, so I don’t know why he risked missing his flight for something he could’ve gotten one hour later, but everyone was cheering him on when he ran back to the terminal with four Dunkin’ coffees in his hands. It was the most Bostonian thing I’d ever experienced to date! $10.00

12 p.m. — I’m back home and a window technician comes by to give a quote on fixing some windows that aren’t properly aligned. He says he has to talk to his boss and research material costs, so he leaves without giving an estimated cost. I’m sure I’ll hear back next week, though.

5 p.m. — I cancel my Canva free trial, which I used to its full extent to plan wedding decor, save the dates, invites, and signs. I don’t need the premium features anymore since I’ve finished designing everything. Now I’m going to wait until June to print out the invites.

Daily Total: $10.00

Day Six: Saturday

9 a.m. — I continue my tutorials on Apache Airflow and Astronomer (yes, the company that was allegedly involved in that Coldplay cheating scandal, which they’re now saying wasn’t an affair). It seems like my new job is going to be very demanding and they’re giving me two big projects (which I’m very happy about because my last job never gave me meaningful work) that require me to use Astronomer. I find it so much easier to learn on the weekends and tech is a never-ending hamster wheel of learning. I always try to study in the mornings and then do fun stuff later on in the day.

1:30 p.m. — I go to apple picking with a couple friend of ours. M. and I met at a board game meet-up and we instantly bonded being board game nerds and both working in tech. Her boyfriend, P., tags along for everything we do, so I figured, why not invite L., too, so I’m not a third wheel. I pick up some apple cider, veggies, and fruits at the farm stall to eat next week. My favorite apple is Macintosh. I get the BEST apple cider donuts (the perfect amount of crispiness on the outside with soft, warm dough on the inside, and they get the sugar/cinnamon ratio just right, too). I go on a hay ride, stare at some pumpkins, and stomp on some leaves. Man, do I love fall in New England. $30.00

6 p.m. — We stop by a Mexican restaurant and get some birria and al pastor tacos. I’m always a little annoyed when a restaurant charges extra for the birria consomé because, in my opinion, it’s not a birria taco without consomé. It’s the new charging extra for guac on a burrito. I’m not that hungry after the donuts, so I share with L. Delicious. It’s a wonderful end to a great day! $8.00

Daily Total: $38.00

Day Seven: Sunday

9 a.m. — I wake up and just have some cereal. I put on makeup and get dressed. My future mother-in-law arrives, so we take the T into Back Bay to go wedding dress shopping! She has three sons and no daughters, so I invited her to my dress appointment because I knew that would make her really happy. And I want her to be happy because not only does it make L. happy, I also just really like her as a person because she’s really kind and thoughtful. This is also her first wedding dress shopping experience ever, which surprises me because she has so many sisters and friends who have all gotten married!

12 p.m. — To be honest, it doesn’t start off well because the attendant called me a week before and complained that I’d booked the 12 p.m. appointment and she wanted to move it, which was no longer possible because I’d made plans around it. I told her that I was sorry but in future she should block off that time and not make it available on the website if you didn’t want people to schedule it then.

1 p.m. — It’s quite a workout getting in and out of the dresses. I’m not the biggest fan of white dresses and I’ll admit I’m very picky when it comes to fashion, so none of the dresses speak to me even though I’ve tried on 15 dresses in the hour and a half appointment slot, and I’m feeling burnt out towards the end. Before this appointment, there’s been many days where I’ve browsed Teuta Matoshi’s website and look at all the beautiful, whimsical dresses. I did find this Teuta Matoshi butterfly midi white dress that I really want to wear for my wedding, so I think I’ll just take the plunge and order it online.

1:30 p.m. — My future mother-in-law, some friends and I get the lunch specials at Thai Basil, which is this cozy Thai place in a basement on Newbury Street, and probably one of the most affordable restaurants in the area. I love it and come here all the time because the lunch special is delicious and comes with dumplings and chicken Panang curry with rice, and it feels healthy-ish. Their Thai tea is also amazing! It’s also great for bringing my vegetarian and vegan friends because they have a lot of options. I don’t think you can find a better deal in Back Bay. There’s also a lot of chains in the area, so I like supporting a family-run restaurant. $18.00

5 p.m. — I spend $35 on Moida (a K-beauty website) to buy some skincare replacements and makeup for my upcoming engagement shoot! It will be my first time ever getting professional photos and I’m extremely unphotogenic. As one of my male professors pointed out to me once, telling me, “You are so much hotter than your profile picture.” I just laughed it off and told him I got that picture taken after walking in the rain so I didn’t look my best. He was in charge of my grade and was known for failing people for petty reasons, so I’m a little nervous about how it will go. But our photographer is very skilled and I trust her to take good photos even though I’m a terrible model. $35.00

Daily Total: $53.00

Conclusion


“I think I spent significantly more than usual because I ate out a lot, but I regret nothing because I had a lot of fun. I’ve gone through a lot of stressful events in the past two months, so I was able to blow off some steam. Recording my spending was difficult but also fun. I may have missed a couple of small things or not mentioned everything I ate, but it was a fun exercise recording my money diary. I’ll try to eat out less for my health and wallet’s sake. I don’t regret getting concert tickets, though; life is too short not to enjoy yourself.”

Money Diaries are meant to reflect an individual’s experience and do not necessarily reflect Refinery29’s point of view. Refinery29 in no way encourages illegal activity or harmful behavior.

The first step to getting your financial life in order is tracking what you spend — to try on your own, check out our guide to managing your money every day. For more Money Diaries, click here.

Do you have a Money Diary you’d like to share? Submit it with us here.

Have questions about how to submit or our publishing process? Read our Money Diaries FAQ doc here or email us here.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

We Are The Money Diaries Team — Ask Us Anything



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/QFrJyBO
via IFTTT

Academy Award Winner Michael B. Jordan . It sounds right. It is right. Jordan won his first Oscar on Sunday for Best Actor for h is work...

Academy Award Winner Michael B. Jordan. It sounds right. It is right. Jordan won his first Oscar on Sunday for Best Actor for his work in Sinners, where he played enigmatic and enthralling twins Smoke and Stack, respectively. In the room at the Dolby Theatre, when Jordan’s name was announced, the applause was deafening. You could feel the love from the actor’s peers. You could feel the joy from the filmmakers, family, press, and every single person from the front row to the mezzanine to the lobbies where people, who were huddled around screens, erupted in screams, tears, and laughter when Jordan’s name was called. When it was, he sat there stunned, like he couldn’t believe what was happening. Well, it happened. Michael B. Jordan won. And he won for playing two (three if we’re being specific) complex Black men in Ryan Coogler’s wild, bombastic, thrilling, original film about vampires, freedom, love, and Black art. It was an Oscars moment for the history books, one that we’ll look back on with wonder and pride, one that will be replaying in montages and memes for decades to come. And it had absolutely nothing to do with Timothée Chalamet. 

Every year, we do the discourse dance around the nominees for the major acting awards. Every year, there’s the early frontrunners (Chalamet for Marty Supreme), the legacy nominees (Ethan Hawke for Blue Moon), the pleasant surprises (Wagner Moura for The Secret Agent) and the performances from the Best Picture standouts (Jordan and Leonardo DiCaprio for One Battle After Another). This year, Chalamet dominated the discussion early for his unconventional Marty Supreme press tour, in which he blatantly told the world he wanted an Oscar, badly, attested to his own greatness, and performed his ambition loudly, proudly, and clumsily. Sure, it turned some people off, but The Oscars has awarded many a men people don’t like (see: Sean Penn). Closer to Hollywood’s biggest night, Chalamet made comments that pundits swear “lost” him the Oscar. In an interview with Matthew McConoughey during a CNN and Variety town hall, posted on February 24, Chalamet said “no one cares” about ballet and opera and that he wouldn’t want to be involved in art forms with less eyeballs than movies.

The comments ignited a firestorm among fans of these classical art forms and sparked responses from major ballet and opera institutions and performers. The conversation has now turned into something I find unsetting. Due to the backlash, they say, Chalamet’s guaranteed Oscar win was negated, and that Jordan basically won by default because no one wanted to vote for the bratty ballet hater. Not only is this narrative downright disrespectful to Jordan and the brilliance of his performances, it’s blatantly untrue. Oscar voting ended mere days after Chalamet’s comments resurfaced online.

It’s likely that most of the voters had completed their ballots long before Chalamet’s take on ballet broke the internet. You could argue that the grating press tour did hurt Chalamet’s chances, but Marty Supreme also didn’t make the cultural splash – or have the longevity — that director Josh Safdie and co. had hoped. Plus, the Oscars don’t tend to award men this early in their careers, or for performances like the one Timothee gives in Marty Supreme (which I did enjoy). It’s also true that Sinners was just better. Michael B. Jordan was just better. Sinners is a singular piece of art that broke box office records, sparked cultural debates, deep-dive social media takes, and ancestral explorations. The fact is that Michael B. Jordan won an Oscar because he deserved it. And the articles focusing on Chalamet in the aftermath of Jordan’s win are frustrating at best and, at worst, an indication of a racist industry that refuses to believe a Black man could have won on merit alone. 

Michael B. Jordan won the Oscar because he deserved it. And the articles focusing on Chalamet in the aftermath of Jordan’s win are frustrating at best and, at worst, an indication of a racist industry that refuses to believe a Black man could have won on merit alone. 

In the 48 hours since the Oscars, there have been many dissections of “where Timothée went wrong.” The New York Times headline reads, “How Michael B. Jordan Won (and Timothée Chalamet Lost) Best Actor at 2026 Oscars”. Variety’s Oscar postmortem piece headline didn’t even mention Jordan by name. It reads, in part, “How Timothée Chalamet Lost the Race.” Decider went with, “4 Big Reasons Timothée Chalamet Lost That Oscar”. And Vox’s defense of Jordan’s win also inexplicably chooses to center Chalamet: “The Oscar was never really Timothée Chalamet’s to begin with.” Each of these pieces make Michael B. Jordan’s win about his white counterpart. They belittle MBJ’s achievement — the highest one in his industry — and pull focus from what should be a celebration, not an interrogation of what went “wrong.” Even implying that there is something “wrong” with Jordan’s win is offensive and insolent. You know the age-old Black saying that we have to work twice as hard for half as much? Well even when you do, like Jordan did playing Smoke and Stack, they’ll try to explain away your excellence. It’s a feeling Black folks in any workplace know all too well. 

Backstage at The Oscars, I overheard the worst take on why Sinners, according to this person, “had the momentum.” The industry insider, not famous, said loudly enough for anyone around to hear it, “The BAFTAs was actually the best thing to happen to Sinners.” The BAFTAs incident, an unfortunately ableist and racist fumble by the BBC in which racial slurs were hurled at members of the Sinners cast, including Jordan, and then left in the show’s broadcast, was a disheartening and frustrating event that caused trauma and infuriating conversations for days. It also occurred a week before Oscar voting ended.

To say that the BAFTAs incident, or Chalamet’s insensitive comments, were at all the reason for Sinners historic wins, is to say it’s unfathonable that a Black film could gain this prestigious acknowledgement on its own. Frankly, it’s racist. And it negates all of the work the cast and Coogler did all season to campaign, hustle, and make sure the word got out to Academy voters. They were at every red carpet (I would know, I was there interviewing them) and at every event preaching the gospel of this film. As they should have been. They knew their work was good, and that audience loved it, and they capitalized on the moment. That’s not luck, that’s smart strategy. 

Say whatever you want about how Chalamet campaigned for an Oscar, but the fact that he did isn’t new, and in fact, Jordan campaigned just as hard. To claim that the only reason MBJ won was by default is to not only ignore that he pulled off timeless performances that were the standout of his career and the absolute best of the year, it also overlooks that Jordan simply ran a better campaign. He walked carpets with his mom, celebrated his friendship with longtime collaborator, Ryan Coogler, and towed the perfect line between confidence and humility that Black men are often forced to. He doesn’t get to yell about his ambition like Chalamet does. But he also didn’t have to. He has the resume to back it up. And the work spoke for itself. 

Sinners was an ambitious undertaking. And for Jordan, he had to carefully construct the subtle differences between his characters — Smoke’s powerful restraint vs. Stack’s charisma and faux bravado — and master the mannerisms of each. The man even manipulated his dimples depending which twin he was playing. That takes an immeasurable amount of skill. And people are still hung up on someone else “losing” than Jordan’s precision and claiming his rightful spot as an Academy Award winner. The truth is that white men like Chalamet get to behave badly (what he did is nowhere near as bad as the many abusers who are Oscar winners) and still win. All the time. If the Academy wanted to award Chalamet’s performance, they would have. There are really people who think that if Timothée Chalamet had said the right things and was nicer to opera and ballet, he would have had the Oscar locked. To those people, I ask: “Y’all Klan?” 

In his Oscars acceptance speech, Jordan thanked “the people that came before me” before shouting out Sidney Poitier, Denzel Washington, Halle Berry, Jamie Foxx, Forrest Whitaker, and Will Smith. The only other Black performers to win Best Actor or Best Actress at the Academy Awards. It was a moment that gave me chills. Every single one of those actors has been the exception in an industry hell bent on erasing Black artists and their contributions. Jordan stands on their shoulders, but he — like ancestors dream for the generation that come after them — has built on their work and created his own with even more freedom. Alongside Coogler, Jordan is laying a freeing foundation for the next cohort. It makes me emotional thinking about the artists this win will inspire, and the budding Black legends who will climb up onto Jordan’s shoulders. 

“To be amongst those giants, amongst those greats, amongst my ancestors, amongst my guy,” Jordan said. “Thank you, everybody in this room, and everybody at home for supporting me over my career. I feel it. I know you guys want me to do well, and I want to do that because you guys bet on me.” As someone who bet on MBJ stock early, I was weeping at this moment (seriously, I was crying so hard backstage at the Oscars, someone asked me if I was in the Jordan family). Let’s not forget that Jordan also won the Actor Award over Chalamet earlier this month. When Jordan’s name was called then, Viola Davis opened the envelope and yelled, ““You are shining, Harold Loomis!” from Joe Turner’s Come and Gone, August Wilson’s 1984 play. “That line is constantly playing out in my mind,” Davis said to Variety, “because what it encapsulates is someone stepping into their purpose. It gives me goose bumps. And that’s how I felt about Michael B Jordan.” Always listen to Viola Davis.

Let’s put the racism aside for a second. It’s there and it’s clear. But it’s also unfair to lump in Jordan’s career highlight with Chalamet’s stumbles. I understand that including Chalamet in the headline of this very piece may be feeding into exactly what I’m critiquing, but I also want to make sure as many people as possible read this. And the sad truth is that Chalamet’s name is trending right now alongside Jordan’s. That’s a problem I can’t fix, but I can say with my full chest that Michael B. Jordan earned his Oscar. Period. 

For decades in this industry, from childhood roles like Hard Ball, The Wire and All My Children, to teen staple Friday Night Lights, and formative performances in Fruitvale Station, and the Creed franchise. To groundbreaking blockbusters Black Panther and Sinners, Jordan has been steadily working towards this moment. In 2020, I wrote about Jordan’s Oscar snub for Just Mercy. The headline was “Shouldn’t Michael B. Jordan Have An Oscar Nomination By Now?” in which I argued that Jordan was long overdue for recognition from The Academy. That was six years ago. Now, he’s finally gotten the accolade he deserves. 

We know how the Oscars has treated Black talent in the past. This is the same awarding body that gave history-making awards to Coogler and cinematographer Autumn Duward-Arkapaw while also passing over Sinners for Best Picture for a movie that barely respects its Black women characters. We know that we cannot uphold white-led institutions as the barometer of validation for Black art. But the industry is still set up in such a way that the Oscar winner title matters. Jordan knows this. He’s been working towards this. Let’s not do him a disservice by eclipsing his moment with a silly controversy that’s not even real. Michael B. Jordan stepped into his purpose Sunday night. Nobody lost that Oscar. It wasn’t anybody else’s to give away. MBJ won. That should be the story. 

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Sinners Won Long Before The Oscars

The Political Gap Between The Oscars & The Grammys

KPop Demon Hunters Made Oscars History



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/aEKgBJ9
via IFTTT

People walk along a quiet street in Havana on February 8, 2026. The Cuban government on February 6 announced emergency measures to address...

People walk along a quiet street in Havana on February 8, 2026. The Cuban government on February 6 announced emergency measures to address a crippling energy crisis worsened by US sanctions, including the adoption of a four-day work week for state-owned companies and fuel sale restrictions. (Photo by ADALBERTO ROQUE / AFP via Getty Images)

A quick Google search of “Cuba” yields three dominant themes: the U.S. embargo on the Caribbean island, President Donald Trump, and oil, with the Cuban baseball league making the occasional cameo.

None of this is surprising. Most mainstream coverage of Cuba is published in relation to the United States, when the U.S. is a cause and Cuba is the effect. The more than six-decade long U.S. embargo is the focal point because it’s a clean narrative: here’s what it’s doing to the island, here’s what lifting it might fix, and here’s who’s to blame for Cuba’s suffering. The same question is recycled endlessly. 

That scrutiny is warranted. U.S. foreign policy toward Cuba deserves examination. The U.S. embargo against Cuba impacts everyday life on the island, with trade restrictions worsening shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods and, according to the United Nations, sanctions leading to an estimation of billions of dollars in economic damage each year. Most recently, U.S. sanctions targeting oil shipments have exacerbated Cuba’s fuel shortage, engendering mass blackouts and fuel shortages. 

But this isn’t the full story. It erases how the Cuban government’s centralized economic policies have stifled growth, how aging infrastructure has strained basic services, and how the collapse of Soviet support in the 1990s triggered an economic shock the country has never fully recovered from.

The Cuban government has spent decades pushing the story that Washington, and Washington alone, is responsible for the island’s suffering. And every time that framing goes unchallenged in national and international press, the Cuban government benefits from it.

“The Cuban government has spent decades pushing the story that Washington, and Washington alone, is responsible for the island’s suffering. And every time that framing goes unchallenged in national and international press, the Cuban government benefits from it.”

 Suanny Garcia Barales

This framing also crowds out another story, the one about what the Cuban government does to its own people. It erases how repression and the systematic silencing of dissent have broken something harder to measure than GDP: the freedom to speak and to imagine a different reality.

When you go looking for that story, what you find are mostly NGO reports, not news articles. For example, a Human Rights Watch account found the government has systematically repressed dissent. Cubalex documented 56 deaths of people in detention or under Cuban state custody over two years, with “excessive force” cited as a leading cause. By September 2024, the Cuban Institute for Freedom of Expression and Press had tallied 99 arbitrary detentions, 179 threats and acts of aggression, and 126 physical assaults against journalists and activists.

These findings don’t circulate widely and that’s not an accident. Reporting on Cuba’s internal repression requires access that the Cuban government routinely denies. Foreign journalists operate under strict limitations on the island, and those who push too hard risk expulsion. Independent Cuban journalists face something worse: prosecution. Ultimately, the story gets filed under “difficult to cover,” something new happens elsewhere, and editors move on. 

Dr. Lisandro Pérez, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Cuban studies scholar, told Refinery29 Somos: “With the exception of coverage in Miami, Cuba only really gets coverage on a national basis when something happens.” He described it like this: “Imagine that it’s like a theater, right? And those of us who are always following Cuba and interested in Cuba are sitting in the theater, which is largely empty. And then something happens — the Pope visits Cuba, there’s a boat lift, there’s a change in U.S. policy — and then the theater fills up again. The press comes in, everybody else comes in. And then when that’s finished, when it sort of wears out, the theater empties again. And there we are, just by ourselves.”

“Cuba only really gets coverage on a national basis when something happens.”

Dr. Lisandro Pérez

It’s the nature of the news cycle. But it’s also a cycle that places much of its weight on the U.S. and consistently misses the elephant in the room: Cuba’s own government, and the Cubans living under it. 

Cuban voices on the island have tried to speak up about their reality, but they’ve been silenced. A trio of laws, including Decree-Law 35, Decree-Law 370, and the 2024 Social Communication Law, criminalize vaguely defined offenses like spreading “fake news” or criticizing the “social interest, morals, good manners and integrity of people,” giving the state wide latitude to monitor, restrict, and punish Internet users. In practice, that can mean a knock on the door at dawn. It can mean an account flagged or a family member called in for questioning. It can mean losing a government job (which, in Cuba, is most jobs) for something posted and shared online. The law doesn’t need to be applied consistently to be effective. It just needs to make people afraid.

These laws don’t stop at traditional journalism; they also extend to content creators. When encountering Cuba online through Instagram Reels and TikTok videos, it’s worth remembering that the Cuban voices you’re not hearing outnumber the ones you are. On the island, it’s usually state-approved opinions that make their way to the World Wide Web. 

It’s why some creators who have disagreed with the regime have been arrested. Among them: the creators behind El4tico — known as El Cuartico, or “The Little Room” — an independent digital project founded inside Cuba by Ernesto Ricardo Medina and Kamil Zayas Pérez. The meaning behind the name is as powerful as the mission itself. For decades, Cubans have had a phrase, which is part-joke, part-resignation: el cuartico sigue igual (the little room is just the same). It’s what you said when you came back home and found everything exactly as you’d left it. Over time, the cuartico became another name for the country itself, a closed room where the years pass but nothing changes.

“Cuban voices on the island have tried to speak up about their reality, but they’ve been silenced.”

 Suanny Garcia Barales

Medina and Zayas Pérez built something to challenge that. Their videos addressed the realities of life in Cuba and some of its government’s illegal activity on the island. On February 6, 2026, they were arrested. Authorities seized their computers, phones, cameras, and equipment, and are pursuing charges of “propaganda against the constitutional order” and “incitement to commit crimes.” 

In a statement, Pérez said he was arrested due to “the only crime that a dictatorship cannot tolerate: daring to look them in the eye and speak aloud what everyone notices. Their glaring shortcomings, their chronic inefficiencies, their systematic injustices, and the oppression that crushes the dignity of an entire people.”

There are hundreds of cases like this. In fact, Cuba currently holds more than 1,000 political prisoners. It’s the reason why Cubans fear speaking up, because speaking means arrest, or losing a job, or becoming unhireable overnight. 

Dr. Pérez puts it this way: “I think there might not be enough coverage on how people generally have to subsist in Cuba and the problems of subsisting there. And how, in many ways, Cubans have been so resilient over the past 50 years in terms of their living conditions.” 

“I think there might not be enough coverage on how people generally have to subsist in Cuba and the problems of subsisting there. And how, in many ways, Cubans have been so resilient over the past 50 years in terms of their living conditions.”

Dr. Lisandro Pérez

People often ask how to help Cuba, especially with the U.S. block of oil supply. They want to send items, money, anything they can to the island. But the most important thing we can do for the Cuban people right now is to refuse to let U.S. foreign policy be the only lens through which we view Cuba. 

This means covering the stories of its thousands of political prisoners, not as a footnote to a sanctions debate, but as a story in its own right. It means platforming Cuban journalists and activists in exile who are reporting on the island at significant personal cost. It means asking, when Cuba does make the news, whether the Cuban government’s role in its people’s suffering is being named as clearly as Washington’s. 

Cuba deserves a fuller conversation than the one we’ve been having. So do the people on the island who don’t get to have it at all.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/QsDgUVY
via IFTTT

Hannah Einbinder was asked how she felt hearing Javier Bardem say “ Free Palestine ” from the Oscars stage . She told Variety that she f...

Hannah Einbinder was asked how she felt hearing Javier Bardem say “Free Palestine” from the Oscars stage. She told Variety that she felt “absolute pride and gratitude.” Then she was asked if she was surprised that no one else said anything. She said: “No.” Sit with that for a second. Not the silence, but the unsurprise at the silence. Because the absence of surprise is more damning than the quiet itself, far more telling than any speech that wasn’t given, more political in its way than a pin on the lapel or the clutch with the message or the polite acknowledgment from the host that yes, these are indeed “very chaotic, frightening times” and here’s a Dave & Buster’s joke so we can all relax. The bar has been lowered so completely that one sentence from a Spanish presenter counts as the political moment of the night, and yet it’s worth asking whether it was ever really higher, or whether we just convinced ourselves it was.

Either way, this year wasn’t supposed to test the question. The lead-up to the final bow of awards season was loud. At the Grammys in February, Bad Bunny took home Album of the Year for Debí Tirar Más Fotos, the first Spanish-language album to win in the award’s history, and opened his speech with “ICE out,” receiving a standing ovation that felt like the room exhaling with diffusion. Billie Eilish said “no one is illegal on stolen land.” Justin and Hailey Bieber, Kehlani, Carole King, Joni Mitchell wore “ICE OUT” pins down the carpet, and people who hadn’t been in the political conversation for years were suddenly in it, suddenly wearing it. Expletives flew on CBS, Grammy organisers called it a “return to form” for artists’ political engagement, noting that the music industry draws a less risk-averse crowd: “These are folks who are known for six-stage shows, crazy costumes, being kind of rebellious, punk rock, that’s the music industry.”

What the Oscars did and didn’t say

Then the season rolled forward to the Oscars, Hollywood’s biggest night, its most-watched stage, the room where the industry holds up a mirror to itself and decides what it sees, and the roar became, with a few exceptions, almost nothing. There were gestures, there are always gestures. Saja Kilani from The Voice of Hind Rajab, stood on the red carpet and said: “There is no ceasefire right now, there are bombings happening to this day. Destruction, displacement, all over the world, Palestine, Lebanon, Iran and Venezuela, everywhere.” Sara Bareilles wore an ICE OUT pin. Glennon Doyle carried a clutch that read “FUCK ICE.” These are the forms protest takes when it lives on an accessory rather than at a podium, just legible enough to be seen, small enough to be deniable and most importantly, quiet enough for everyone to still have a good night.

Conan O’Brien had warned us at the top of the night — acknowledged the chaos, the fear, the state of the world — and pivoted immediately to the joke. It landed. It was also a preview of everything that followed. Joachim Trier, accepting Best International Feature for the apolitical Norwegian film that beat The Voice of Hind Rajab, closed by paraphrasing James Baldwin: “All adults are responsible for all children. Let’s not vote for politicians who don’t take this seriously.” And then there was Bardem, the exception, which is its own kind of comment on the rule. Presenting Best International Feature alongside Priyanka Chopra Jonas, he said it plainly: “No to war and free Palestine.” At the Vanity Fair party afterwards, he said: “I’m wearing a pin I used in 2003 with the Iraq war, which was an illegal war. And we are here, 23 years after, with another illegal war, created by Trump and Netanyahu with another lie.” He said he feels “sad” that he still has to say it.

The art was brave, but the room wasn’t

Here is the specific dissonance worth sitting with, because it’s the part that makes the hush into something more than just ordinary silence. Best Picture winner One Battle After Another was this year’s Oscars sweetheart, taking six of the 13 awards it was up for. And it’s no coincidence that the film the Academy chose to crown is one concerned with exploring the essence of revolution rather than naming the specifics of its cause. A film about resistance, in the abstract, is safe. A film that names the war, the policy, the body count, that’s a different conversation entirely, and Hollywood has never been particularly interested in having it.

Because here’s the thing about that room. These are some of the wealthiest, most powerful people on the planet, gathered to celebrate each other in a system that has made them exactly that. The Oscars is not a room full of dissidents. It is a room full of people who benefit enormously from the way things are, and who have learned, over a very long time, to endorse the message without having to say it. You can give six gold statues to a film about the cost of looking away, and then look away. Hollywood has been rehearsing this particular move for long enough that it no longer looks like a move.

Awards season politics

So why does the Grammys roar and the Oscars go quiet? Part of it is structural and unsexy. Film actors carry franchise obligations, streaming deals, studio relationships, awards campaigns that have been running for months and cost real money. The Oscars ceremony is choreographed and contractually managed in ways the Grammys isn’t, it is timed, it is produced, it is insured against itself. Organisers of this season’s pin campaign noted that objections could come from managers, corporate partners, or simply the design house that “didn’t want them to literally poke holes in the dress.”

But the sharper version of the structural argument is this: the Oscars is the industry celebrating itself. The Grammys is artists celebrating each other. That difference in power dynamics produces a different appetite for risk. At the Grammys, Bad Bunny is Bad Bunny, an artist at his absolute cultural peak, with a stadium tour already sold out and an audience that would have felt betrayed by silence. At the Oscars, everyone is in some way someone’s employee, someone’s campaign, someone’s ongoing investment.

The absence that defined the Oscars

The most politically charged films in the Best International Feature category — The Voice of Hind Rajab, a docudrama about a five-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israeli forces, and It Was Just an Accident, whose Iranian screenwriter had been arrested for supporting protest movements — didn’t win. They lost to a Norwegian family drama about an estranged father trying to reconnect with his daughters. The lead actor of The Voice of Hind Rajab — Motaz Malhees, who played the emergency dispatcher who took Hind Rajab’s call while her family was killed around her — was not in the room. Trump’s travel ban on Palestinians barred him from entering the United States to attend the ceremony for the film about her death. Three days before the Oscars, he posted on Instagram: “I am not allowed to enter.” The story was present at the ceremony just in a different way through nomination, absence, and in the policy that created the absence. 

Einbinder has been in these rooms. She said “Free Palestine” and “f*** ICE” at the Emmys last year,  tucked between her Eagles allegiance and a bleep, then stood backstage and said, quietly: “I have friends in Gaza who are working as frontline workers, as doctors now.” She knows what a room that chooses to speak looks like, and in turn she knew what this one looked like too.

What her single word describes is a culture that has normalised its own silence so thoroughly that the threshold for courage has collapsed. Not a failure of individual nerve, though it is also that. The accumulated logic of an industry that has learned to separate aesthetic politics from actual ones, to make films about resistance, champion them, hand them statues, and walk back to the party. The art gets to be brave, and the people who make it get to stay comfortable. The gap that keeps widening isn’t between Hollywood’s stated values and its behaviour on awards night; everyone already knows that gap exists, everyone has made peace with it or pretends to. The gap that matters is the one between how loudly the room applauds the message and how quietly it declines to repeat it. 

Because the world that made the Grammys electric did not pause between February and March.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Why Won't The Oscars Credit Indian Fashion?

KPop Demon Hunters Made Oscars History

Art Is Political. Are Artists Meeting The Moment?



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/yH08Z3C
via IFTTT

It’s time to wake up and get out of hibernation! March 20th kicks off Aries season , as well as the Spring Equinox and astrological new ...

It’s time to wake up and get out of hibernation! March 20th kicks off Aries season, as well as the Spring Equinox and astrological new year. Aries is the first sign of the zodiac, so it pushes us to be brave in the month ahead. We all want to lead and take charge, which is why our courageous, independent, and competitive attitudes will be seen. Winning is not good enough unless we prove to be trailblazers in one area of our lives. This year, it’ll be our motto.

We may get lost in our feelings when the sun connects with elusive Neptune in Aries on March 22nd. Although it will be nice to live in La La Land for a moment, the wake up call will hit us hard the following day, when we have to deal with real life responsibilities. Try not to get too swept away in a dream or fantasy, and make sure that you have one foot firmly cemented on the ground while navigating this cosmic energy. The positive side to this transit is that it will ignite our creativity, making us tender-hearted, nostalgic, and bewitching. 

On March 25th, the sun links up with Saturn in Aries and Pluto in Aquarius. This planetary trifecta is going to demand that we boss up and take control. Triangular situations may arise when Pluto integrates a few people into a situation in which all parties want to dominate. Saturn urges us to adhere to structure and discipline. With a lot of effort, we’ll be able to evolve. The caveat is that growth takes time and is a process. Change doesn’t happen overnight, but it benefits our lives — a sentiment we will embrace when Saturn and Pluto harmonize on March 28th. Think of this as “The Tower” tarot card moment. Things fall apart so they can be put back together differently, in a way that works for us.

Chin up, Aries season isn’t all doom and gloom though. The sun and Jupiter in Cancer square off on April 5th, lending a wonderfully optimistic vibe that will radiate from our auras. This is a magnificent day to take a leap of faith, believe in our dreams, and say how we feel to others, as long as it’s positive. The world will be our oyster, and we will feel the need to take chances in everything we do, since luck is on our side.

There is a healing energy on April 16th, when the sun and the centaur Chiron form a conjunction in Aries. Chiron is “the wounded healer that ironically could not heal itself,” which means we will help others mend their pain. In return, they might give us advice, so that we can do the same. Our hearts will be heavy on this day, as we are full of emotion and empathy. Reach out to a trusted friend or therapist if you need to talk to someone about your problems. They’ll offer a compassionate shoulder to lean on and a source of comfort. Remember, you’re not alone. 

While the sun’s sting in Aries brings a ton of different sentiments to the forefront of our lives, it also gives us the insight and knowledge to understand ourselves and others better. The month ahead might be heavy, but we’ll have moments of levity that prove to be meaningful and exciting. The obstacles may seem immense; however, in the true spirit of the zodiac sign Aries, we’ve got to keep on going!

Important Dates For Aries Season

March 20th: The sun enters Aries, starting a new solar journey for the fire sign.

March 20th: Mercury retrograde ends in Pisces, clearing up the miscommunications and missteps from February 26th, when the planetary backspin began.

March 30th: Venus gets tender in Taurus, offering commitment and camaraderie. 

April 1st: The Full Moon in Libra is a time to reflect upon the relationships we hold dear.

April 9th: Mars becomes more desirous in Aries, adding passion and desire to all we do. 

April 14th: Mercury dives into Aries, making communication fierce and direct.

April 17th: The New Moon in Aries encourages us to set intentions that will augment our spring.

April 19th: The sun moves into Taurus, bringing artistry and beauty our way.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Your March Horoscope 2026 Is Here



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/nLmlqx4
via IFTTT

Oscars night brought tons of historical wins for Sinners and KPop Demon Hunters , and the celebrations didn't end when the award show ...

Oscars night brought tons of historical wins for Sinners and KPop Demon Hunters, and the celebrations didn't end when the award show finished. Immediately after, celebrities hopped over to the annual Vanity Fair Oscars party to cheers and mingle with their fellow nominees, winners, and more industry peers.

And yes, many of them changed out of their stunning Oscars red carpet outfits into new ( even more extravagant) looks for the afterparty. Winners like Michael B. Jordan and Maggie Kang showed out with their Oscar trophies and beaming smiles as the cherries on top of their looks. Scarves and capes notably graced the necks of red carpet pros like Bella Hadid and Olandria Carthen, amongst other It girls. And we especially loved seeing coordinating looks from iconic duos, like partners, siblings, and even castmates (hello, Heated Rivalry boys!).

Ahead, see the best Vanity Fair red carpet looks that wrapped up awards season on a seriously glamorous note.

Odessa A'zion

Photo: Courtesy of Taylor Hill/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Michael B. Jordan

Photo: Courtesy of Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images.

PinkPantheress

Photo: Courtesy of Daniele Venturelli/WireImage/Getty Images.

Jeff Goldblum and Emilie Livingston

Photo: Courtesy of Daniele Venturelli/WireImage/Getty Images.

Olandria Carthen

Photo: Courtesy of Doug Peters/PA Images/Getty Images.

Priyanka Chopra

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner

Photo: Courtesy of Taylor Hill/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Colman Domingo

Photo: Courtesy of Christopher Polk/Variety/Getty Images.

Rita Ora

Photo: Courtesy of Christopher Polk/Variety/Getty Images.

Kendall Jenner

Photo: Courtesy of Doug Peters/PA Images/Getty Images.

Connor Storie and Hudson Williams

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Bella Hadid

Photo: Courtesy of Neilson Barnard/Getty Images.

Elle Fanning and Dakota Fanning

Photo: Courtesy of Amy Sussman/Getty Images.

Audrey Nuna

Photo: Courtesy of Doug Peters/PA Images/Getty Images.

Teyana Taylor

Photo: Courtesy of Taylor Hill/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Tate Mcrae

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Paul Anthony Kelly

Photo: Courtesy of Chad Salvador/WWD/Getty Images.

Donatella Versace

Photo: Courtesy of Steve Granitz/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Devon Lee Carlson

Photo: Courtesy of Chad Salvador/WWD/Getty Images.

Anya Taylor-Joy

Photo: Courtesy of Jamie McCarthy/WireImage/Getty Images.

Dua Lipa

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Troye Sivan

Photo: Courtesy of Christopher Polk/Variety/Getty Images.

Maggie Kang

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Demi Moore

Photo: Courtesy of Christopher Polk/Variety/Getty Images.

Meg Ryan

Photo: Courtesy of Christopher Polk/Variety/Getty Images.

Mikey Madison

Photo: Courtesy of Taylor Hill/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Robert Pattinson and Suki Waterhouse

Photo: Courtesy of

Hailey Bieber

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Simone Ashley

Photo: Courtesy of Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images.

Rose Byrne

Photo: Courtesy of Steve Granitz/FilmMagic/Getty Images.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Our Favorite 2026 Oscars Red Carpet Looks

KPop Demon Hunters Made Oscars History

Sinners Won Long Before The Oscars



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/GTC1JBd
via IFTTT

Kelsey, age 28, had a l ong-standing crush on Peter* when they were at high school together, but she’d never thought he’d be interested ...

Kelsey, age 28, had a long-standing crush on Peter* when they were at high school together, but she’d never thought he’d be interested in her romantically. “He seemed too cool,” she says. So, when he started DMing her over Instagram a few years after they graduated, eventually asking her out, it all felt like a “dream”. 

She liked that Peter seemed to share a lot of her values. “He was very liberal, pretty hippy, and vegan — into rave culture and that kind of stuff,” she says. “He made me want to be a better person.” But about a year into dating, towards the end of the COVID pandemic, Peter started to change. It began with his diet: he became a carnivore, citing Paul Saladino — an influencer who promotes a carnivore diet — as his inspiration. When Kelsey looked up Saladino, she saw that he is an anti-vaxxer. And, soon enough, Peter started to parrot Saladino’s views on vaccinations. 

While Peter’s change in views disturbed Kelsey, she still saw the qualities she’d fallen for in him. “We still had our good moments, and still laughed a lot together,” she says. “I was hoping he would change.”

However, as time went on, Peter’s views only got more extreme, and his behavior towards Kelsey grew more controlling. “He started trying to dictate what I should eat, saying I shouldn’t eat vegetables anymore,” she says. He also started telling her to dress more modestly, and to dye her hair, which was pink at the time, a “normal” colour. 

In the last few months of their relationship, Peter began to make comments that were transphobic and sexist. He started to quote Jordan Peterson in conversation regularly, and would read books about traditional marriage and roles for women versus men. On one occasion, he tried to read a passage from The Case for Patriarchy to Kelsey, which resulted in an explosive argument. They broke up shortly after. “Our relationship just started to feel very one-sided by then — like I had to please him,” she says. “It didn’t matter how I was feeling anymore.”

Kesley isn’t the only person whose relationship has fallen apart after her partner started to show interest in the ‘red-pill’ — a growing subculture that challenges feminist narratives and emphasizes traditional gender roles as the natural way of life. Taken from the movie The Matrix, it’s the concept of waking up to the realities of the world, while the likes of you and me are “blue pilled” or “normies” (incels are “black pilled”). In a viral TikTok captioned “RED PILL CONTENT RUINED MY RELATIONSHIP” Mila explains how she broke up with her boyfriend after he started listening to Fresh and Fit (a podcast widely criticized for misogyny) and consuming Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) content. The video has been met with over a dozen comments from people who claim to have lost partners to the ‘red-pill’. 

With recent research showing that TikTok and YouTube shorts are rapidly amplifying misogynistic and male supremacist content, it’s perhaps no surprise that more people are seeing their partners, family members and friends exhibit this kind of thinking. It’s this kind of thinking that documentarian Louis Theroux explores in his new Netflix documentary, Inside the Manosphere. This patriarchal network rooted in misogyny also gives way to more extremist views which we watch play out on camera with racist, homophobic and antisemitic slurs being hurled. 

A YouTube spokesperson said: “Hate speech, harassment and cyberbullying have no place on YouTube. We have strict content policies in these areas which we rigorously enforce using a combination of human reviewers and machine learning technology.”

According to TikTok, “community guidelines specifically identify misogyny as a hateful ideology and we remove it from the platform with a variety of methods. Between October and December 2024 , 91.6% of videos removed under our hateful behaviour Community Guidelines were removed proactively.”

Last month’s release of Netflix’s Adolescence ignited conversations nationally around the spread of ‘red-pill’ content among young boys, which even reached British Parliament. However, it isn’t just young boys who are vulnerable to ‘red-pill’ content. “There’s definitely a wide age range in the manosphere,” says Jessica Aiston, a Postdoctoral Researcher at Queen Mary University of London who authored a paper on the representation of feminism within the manosphere. “The focus on vulnerable young boys does overlook the fact there’s a lot of older men, including people in their 30 and 40s, some retired, in these spaces”

In Adolescence, Jamie’s parents struggle to spot the warning signs of trouble — they thought Jamie was ‘safe’ upstairs in his bedroom (not getting into trouble out on the street). This resonates with Kelsey, who says she couldn’t have foreseen her partner falling down the rabbit hole. “It felt like a healthy relationship; we were equal,” she says. 

Adolescence blames the manosphere for the rise in men signing up to right-wing, conservative ideologies. But as critics of the show have pointed out, the manosphere does not exist in a vacuum. Rather it’s the latest continuation of a long history of violent misogyny.

As Aiston points out, it is usually the case that people drawn to the manosphere already have some pre-existing view that the community is tapping into. “There are definitely some people who might be more vulnerable, such as people who already hold some sexist or anti-feminist beliefs — which, of course, is not uncommon, given that we do live in a patriarchal society. Or, they might hold a soft view of them, and this is taken to an extreme in the manosphere,” Aiston says. 

For Anna*, age 26 from the UK, there were early signs that her ex, Josh*, might be susceptible to ‘red-pill’ beliefs. Because they were friends for four years before becoming romantically involved, she was familiar with his dating history. “He didn’t have much luck with women throughout most of his 20s,” she says. “I think years and years of frustration with not getting what he wanted from women eventually led him to form a negative opinion of women.” 

It’s easy to see how Josh’s “negative opinion of women” resulting from romantic rejection could be taken to an extreme in certain online spaces. In the manosphere, pseudoscientific theories are often used to blame women for mens’ feelings of sexual or romantic rejection. For example, the “80/20 rule” refers to the pseudoscientific theory that 80% of women are only attracted to the top 20% of men. In Adolescence, it is rejection that ultimately leads Jamie to kill.

Josh and Anna started dating just before Anna was due to move to a different city for a work placement. They exchanged ‘I love you’s’, and planned to be together on her return. After moving, Anna recalls having a conversation with Josh about Andrew Tate over text, where she was deriding Tate’s “idiotic” views. Josh told Anna that while he didn’t agree with what most of Tate says, he had some “good points”. This alarmed Anna: “I suspected that he was taking [Andrew Tate] more seriously than he was letting on.”

A few weeks later, almost out of nowhere, Josh started ignoring Anna’s calls. Eventually, he suggested that they stop speaking until she moved back. “I was completely heartbroken,” she says. He started up contact again within the month, and things went back to normal for a while, with them exchanging messages every day. But this only lasted a short while, before Josh cut contact again. 

The second time this happened, Anna decided to call him out on it. Josh responded by admitting he was deploying a ‘dread game’ — a dating strategy often used by red-pilled men involving uncertainty as a way to increase their perceived value in the eyes of a romantic partner.

“When I told him that ‘dread game’ doesn’t work, he responded that it ‘worked on his ex’. I was absolutely beyond disgusted,” says Anna. “I told him that his ‘tricks’ had completely ruined things with me and I was no longer interested.” Anna says she was reminded of a clip she’d seen where Andrew Tate suggests being cold and distant as a tactic to make women chase you.

These kinds of dating games and strategies are common in the manosphere, and reflect a view within the community that women are a homogenous group, according to Aiston. “We see this in acronyms like AWALT which stands for All Women Are Like That,” she says. “If you’re in a relationship and you’re reading all these stories about how women act, about how women are toxic, then you might start seeing things like that in your own partner, in your own relationship, even if that’s not the case.”

For Izzy, age 21 from the U.S., her boyfriend Brian’s* descent into the manosphere felt more subtle. At first, it even seemed innocuous, as he grew increasingly preoccupied with ‘self-improvement’. “He had mentioned wanting to work on himself, so he was reading a lot of self-improvement books, and going to the gym” she says. It wasn’t until Brian started mentioning the content creators he was watching — such as the YouTuber Hamza Ahmad — that Izzy realized there was something more sinister about Brian’s newfound obsession with self-improvement. 

“Maybe a few of Hamza’s videos were about working out and bettering yourself — but mostly they are riddled with misogynistic and ‘red-pill’ beliefs,” says Izzy. “I was immediately so scared.”

Aiston says that self-improvement or self-help messages are often used found in red-pill communities. “Sometimes, [red-pill content] can use this self-improvement angle to make it seem more legitimate,” says Aiston. As Izzy experienced, this can make it harder to recognize when the content is harmful. “Going to the gym can, of course, be a good thing — the problem is when it’s framed by these communities in terms of you needing to be strong, because women are making you weak,” says Aiston.

Like Kelsey, Izzy hoped she could change Brian. “It felt like my responsibility to fix him, but I also knew this was a huge rabbit hole that was hard to get out of,” she says. She started by creating a Google doc of “manosphere deprogramming videos” from creators who challenge toxic masculinity. Izzy and Brian watched a few of them together. “He was definitely taking mental notes, but I had to send him the Google doc so he could do this on his own. I did not want to parent him about this,” she says.

Ultimately, though, Brian’s views had changed how Izzy saw him. “The more he delved into the red-pill rhetoric, the more I just couldn’t look at him the same,” she says. “I saw him for the lonely and insecure guy that he really was.” They broke up a few months after Izzy found out about Hamza and the other creators he was watching. Izzy says she was “heartbroken” to have lost the person she thought she knew.  

Laura, in her early 40s, describes a similar heartbreak when her boyfriend of a year started consuming red-pill content during the pandemic, which eventually caused them to break up. “It was so devastating,” she says. “In all honesty, it would have been so much easier if he just died. He’s still around — but the person that I love is gone.” Laura tried to intervene, but says that it was near impossible trying to get through to her partner at the time. “There’s no way to combat it. Giving facts makes it worse: he only dug his heels in even further,” she says.

As Aiston points out, intervening can be extremely hard, because of how these spaces prime men to think. “There’s a lot of distrust of anything outside of the community,” she says. “They can just say that, ‘Oh, that’s because you’re blue pilled’, or ‘you’re brainwashed by feminism’.” 

Even though Izzy recognizes it would have been easier to leave Brian sooner, she is glad she tried to ‘de-program’ him. “During our breakup, he thanked me for pestering him enough to get him to snap out of it,” she says. “He said he was going through a stupid phase, and was starting to notice that it impacted his younger brothers too, which was kind of unnerving to him.

“It’s really important to notice the signs and recognize when your boyfriend is acting off,” continues Izzy. “If you can, talk to your partner about whatever you’re feeling — and hopefully they listen to you.”

*Names have been changed and surnames withheld to protect identities.

This article was originally published in May 2025 and has since been updated.

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

Dating As A Girl Gamer Has Never Been Harder

I'm A 30-Year-Old Black Woman & Have Never Dated

Dating Is Hard. Latina Fetishes Make It Unbearable



from Refinery29 https://ift.tt/iC3DPTg
via IFTTT